Re: [PATCH] HID: logitech-hidpp: Handle timeout differently from busy

From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Wed May 31 2023 - 10:12:33 EST


On Wed, 31 May 2023, Bastien Nocera wrote:

> If an attempt at contacting a receiver or a device fails because the
> receiver or device never responds, don't restart the communication, only
> restart it if the receiver or device answers that it's busy, as originally
> intended.
>
> This was the behaviour on communication timeout before commit 586e8fede795
> ("HID: logitech-hidpp: Retry commands when device is busy").
>
> This fixes some overly long waits in a critical path on boot, when
> checking whether the device is connected by getting its HID++ version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Mark Lord <mlord@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 586e8fede795 ("HID: logitech-hidpp: Retry commands when device is busy")
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217412
> ---
> drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> index 0fcfd85fea0f..2246044b1639 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ static int hidpp_send_message_sync(struct hidpp_device *hidpp,
> dbg_hid("%s:timeout waiting for response\n", __func__);
> memset(response, 0, sizeof(struct hidpp_report));
> ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + goto exit;
> }
>

I have applied this even before getting confirmation from the reporters in
bugzilla, as it's the right thing to do anyway.

Thanks,

--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs