Re: [PATCH] bus: mhi: host: Add userspace character interface

From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Wed May 31 2023 - 12:14:27 EST


On Wed, 31 May 2023 09:04:10 -0600 Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> I think Mani I looking for some "guidance" on the "architecture", and
> frankly so am I. An official Ack from Jakub might not be quite the
> right thing at this stage, but at-least Jakub could come in and say he
> isn't planning on NACKing this right off the bat, in particular because
> this functionality can be used by WWAN devices which seems to be what
> caused the mess the last time around.
>
> We've gone full circle here. This functionality was proposed as part of
> the bus. Jakub came in an NACKed that, which resulted in the WWAN
> subsystem and the guidance that this functionally belongs with the
> devices. I tried to put it with the AIC100/QAIC device based on that,
> and that got NACKed by Daniel (GPU) saying that this belongs with the
> bus. You (Greg) seemed to agree with Daniel on that.
>
> Fixing kernel robot tests is one thing (I haven't seen any reports on
> this iteration), but if there is no agreement on where this lives, isn't
> it DOA?
>
> In summary, if you don't like this, please give some clear guidance.
> Greg, you've told me in the past that you don't discuss "architecture"
> without seeing the code. Here is some code. I don't claim it is
> perfect (you mentioned the QAIC version had some issues you were going
> to help with), but I would like to see some input.

Nothing changed here as far as I'm concerned.

But while I have you -- you should probably discuss your broader
engagement in the upstream community with someone like Greg. The right
balance between throwing code at us and supporting maintainers.
I mean real maintainers of shared subsystems, not your own stuff.