Re: [PATCH 4/7] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-mcu: Add mcu_secproxy

[Nishanth Menon]

On 22:37-20230531, Kumar, Udit wrote:
[...]
> > +	secure_proxy_mcu: mailbox@2a480000 {
> I think, we should start name as  mailbox@2a380000
> > +		compatible = "ti,am654-secure-proxy";
> > +		#mbox-cells = <1>;
> > +		reg-names = "target_data", "rt", "scfg";
> > +		reg = <0x0 0x2a480000 0x0 0x80000>,
> > +		      <0x0 0x2a380000 0x0 0x80000>,
> > +		      <0x0 0x2a400000 0x0 0x80000>;
> 
> I think, we should have increasing order for reg. Unless there is some
> strong reason to keep in this way.

Binding is defined this way - the items section in the binding
enforces the order. As a result the first reg entry(target_data)
address causes the node name.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D