[PATCH] gpiolib: demote the hogging log messages to debug

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>

Drivers should be silent when they work correctly. There's no reason to
emit info messages when GPIO lines are hogged. Demote the message to
debug.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c |  2 +-
 drivers/of/unittest.c  | 16 ++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index a7220e04a93e..e4515bda8915 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -4243,7 +4243,7 @@ int gpiod_hog(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *name,
 	/* Mark GPIO as hogged so it can be identified and removed later */
 	set_bit(FLAG_IS_HOGGED, &desc->flags);
 
-	gpiod_info(desc, "hogged as %s%s\n",
+	gpiod_dbg(desc, "hogged as %s%s\n",
 		(dflags & GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_OUT) ? "output" : "input",
 		(dflags & GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_OUT) ?
 		  (dflags & GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_DIR_VAL) ? "/high" : "/low" : "");
diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
index 2191c0136531..0060334a98a7 100644
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -1849,19 +1849,19 @@ static void __init of_unittest_overlay_gpio(void)
 	 * driver is registered
 	 */
 
-	EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_INFO,
+	EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_DEBUG,
 		     "gpio-<<int>> (line-B-input): hogged as input\n");
 
-	EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_INFO,
+	EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_DEBUG,
 		     "gpio-<<int>> (line-A-input): hogged as input\n");
 
 	ret = platform_driver_register(&unittest_gpio_driver);
 	if (unittest(ret == 0, "could not register unittest gpio driver\n"))
 		return;
 
-	EXPECT_END(KERN_INFO,
+	EXPECT_END(KERN_DEBUG,
 		   "gpio-<<int>> (line-A-input): hogged as input\n");
-	EXPECT_END(KERN_INFO,
+	EXPECT_END(KERN_DEBUG,
 		   "gpio-<<int>> (line-B-input): hogged as input\n");
 
 	unittest(probe_pass_count + 2 == unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count,
@@ -1888,7 +1888,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_overlay_gpio(void)
 	probe_pass_count = unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count;
 	chip_request_count = unittest_gpio_chip_request_count;
 
-	EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_INFO,
+	EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_DEBUG,
 		     "gpio-<<int>> (line-D-input): hogged as input\n");
 
 	/* overlay_gpio_03 contains gpio node and child gpio hog node */
@@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_overlay_gpio(void)
 	unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_gpio_03", NULL),
 		 "Adding overlay 'overlay_gpio_03' failed\n");
 
-	EXPECT_END(KERN_INFO,
+	EXPECT_END(KERN_DEBUG,
 		   "gpio-<<int>> (line-D-input): hogged as input\n");
 
 	unittest(probe_pass_count + 1 == unittest_gpio_probe_pass_count,
@@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_overlay_gpio(void)
 	 *   - processing gpio for overlay_gpio_04b
 	 */
 
-	EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_INFO,
+	EXPECT_BEGIN(KERN_DEBUG,
 		     "gpio-<<int>> (line-C-input): hogged as input\n");
 
 	/* overlay_gpio_04b contains child gpio hog node */
@@ -1943,7 +1943,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_overlay_gpio(void)
 	unittest(overlay_data_apply("overlay_gpio_04b", NULL),
 		 "Adding overlay 'overlay_gpio_04b' failed\n");
 
-	EXPECT_END(KERN_INFO,
+	EXPECT_END(KERN_DEBUG,
 		   "gpio-<<int>> (line-C-input): hogged as input\n");
 
 	unittest(chip_request_count + 1 == unittest_gpio_chip_request_count,
-- 
2.39.2