RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Log if device is unsupported

From: Deucher, Alexander
Date: Mon Jun 05 2023 - 11:29:07 EST


[AMD Official Use Only - General]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 11:23 AM
> To: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Koenig, Christian
> <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx>; Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx>; David
> Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>; Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Log if device is unsupported
>
> Since there is overlap in supported devices, both modules load, but only one
> will bind to a particular device depending on the model and user's
> configuration.
>
> amdgpu binds to all display class devices with VID 0x1002 and then
> determines whether or not to bind to a device based on whether the
> individual device is supported by the driver or not. Log that case, so users
> looking at the logs know what is going on.
>
> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2608
> Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> index 86fbb4138285..410ff918c350 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> @@ -2062,8 +2062,10 @@ static int amdgpu_pci_probe(struct pci_dev
> *pdev,
>
> /* skip devices which are owned by radeon */
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(amdgpu_unsupported_pciidlist); i++) {
> - if (amdgpu_unsupported_pciidlist[i] == pdev->device)
> + if (amdgpu_unsupported_pciidlist[i] == pdev->device) {
> + DRM_INFO("This hardware is only supported by
> radeon.");
> return -ENODEV;

I think this will confuse users even more. As there will be a new "error" message reported. I'd suggest either dropping the message in init per my proposed patch or just leaving things as is.

Alex

> + }
> }
>
> if (amdgpu_aspm == -1 && !pcie_aspm_enabled(pdev))
> --
> 2.40.1