Re: [PATCH] sched: Consider task_struct::saved_state in wait_task_inactive().

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Mon Jun 05 2023 - 12:15:31 EST

Next message: Raag Jadav: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: act8945a: rely on hardware for operating mode"
Previous message: timo . gr: "[PATCH] lib/Kconfig.debug: fix grammar in RUST_BUILD_ASSERT_ALLOW"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH] sched: Consider task_struct::saved_state in wait_task_inactive()."
Next in thread: tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra: "[tip: sched/core] sched: Consider task_struct::saved_state in wait_task_inactive()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2023-06-02 12:37:31 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> I'll stick this in front -- see what happens ;-)

Tested this with the previous one. All good.

Sebastian

Next message: Raag Jadav: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: act8945a: rely on hardware for operating mode"
Previous message: timo . gr: "[PATCH] lib/Kconfig.debug: fix grammar in RUST_BUILD_ASSERT_ALLOW"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH] sched: Consider task_struct::saved_state in wait_task_inactive()."
Next in thread: tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra: "[tip: sched/core] sched: Consider task_struct::saved_state in wait_task_inactive()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]