[PATCH 1/2] clk: sunxi-ng: nkm: consider alternative parent rates when finding rate

From: Frank Oltmanns
Date: Mon Jun 05 2023 - 15:08:38 EST


In case the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag is set, consider using a different
parent rate when determining a new rate.

To find the best match for the requested rate, perform the following
steps for each NKM combination:
- calculate the optimal parent rate,
- find the best parent rate that the parent clock actually supports
- use that parent rate to calculate the effective rate.

In case the clk does not support setting the parent rate, use the same
algorithm as before.

Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
index a0978a50edae..c71e237226f2 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ struct _ccu_nkm {
unsigned long m, min_m, max_m;
};

-static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
- struct _ccu_nkm *nkm)
+static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long *parent, unsigned long rate,
+ struct _ccu_nkm *nkm, struct clk_hw *parent_hw)
{
- unsigned long best_rate = 0;
+ unsigned long best_rate = 0, best_parent_rate = 0, tmp_parent = *parent;
unsigned long best_n = 0, best_k = 0, best_m = 0;
unsigned long _n, _k, _m;

@@ -28,12 +28,29 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
for (_m = nkm->min_m; _m <= nkm->max_m; _m++) {
unsigned long tmp_rate;

- tmp_rate = parent * _n * _k / _m;
+ if (parent_hw) {
+ // We must round up the desired parent rate, because the
+ // rounding down happens when calculating tmp_rate. If we
+ // round down also here, we'd round down twice.
+ unsigned long optimal_parent =
+ (rate * _m + (_n * _k - 1)) / _n / _k;
+
+ tmp_parent = clk_hw_round_rate(parent_hw, optimal_parent);
+
+ // if the optimal parent rate is below the minimum rate of
+ // the parent ignore this combination
+ if (tmp_parent > optimal_parent)
+ continue;
+ tmp_rate = tmp_parent * _n * _k / _m;
+ } else {
+ tmp_rate = tmp_parent * _n * _k / _m;
+ if (tmp_rate > rate)
+ continue;
+ }

- if (tmp_rate > rate)
- continue;
if ((rate - tmp_rate) < (rate - best_rate)) {
best_rate = tmp_rate;
+ best_parent_rate = tmp_parent;
best_n = _n;
best_k = _k;
best_m = _m;
@@ -46,6 +63,8 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_find_best(unsigned long parent, unsigned long rate,
nkm->k = best_k;
nkm->m = best_m;

+ *parent = best_parent_rate;
+
return best_rate;
}

@@ -106,7 +125,7 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
}

static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct ccu_mux_internal *mux,
- struct clk_hw *hw,
+ struct clk_hw *parent_hw,
unsigned long *parent_rate,
unsigned long rate,
void *data)
@@ -124,7 +143,10 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct ccu_mux_internal *mux,
if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
rate *= nkm->fixed_post_div;

- rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+ if (!clk_hw_can_set_rate_parent(&nkm->common.hw))
+ rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm, NULL);
+ else
+ rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm, parent_hw);

if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
rate /= nkm->fixed_post_div;
@@ -159,7 +181,7 @@ static int ccu_nkm_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
_nkm.min_m = 1;
_nkm.max_m = nkm->m.max ?: 1 << nkm->m.width;

- ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm);
+ ccu_nkm_find_best(&parent_rate, rate, &_nkm, NULL);

spin_lock_irqsave(nkm->common.lock, flags);

--
2.40.1