Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Lock and Pointer guards

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 06:17:33AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> That said, I still don't understand why you lke the name "guard" for
> this.  I understand not liking "auto", but "guard" doesn't seem any
> better. In fact, much worse. Guarded expressions means something
> completely different both in real life and in computer science.
> 
> I'm assuming there's some history there, but it makes no sense to me
> as a name here.

I know the name from C++ where it is std::lock_guard<> (well, back when
I still did C++ it wasn't std, but whatever), and Rust seems to have
std::sync::MutexGuard<>.

But if that's the sole objection left, lets have a bike-shed party and
pick a colour :-)

'shield' 'sentry' 'sentinel' 'keeper' 'custodian' 'warden' ?