Re: [PATCH v4 16/19] ext4: call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_mb_clear_bb

[Kemeng Shi]

on 6/6/2023 5:39 PM, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 11:03:24PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
>> call ext4_mb_mark_group_bb in ext4_mb_clear_bb to remove repeat code
>> to update block bitmap and group descriptor on disk.
>>
>> Note: ext4_mb_clear_bb will update buddy and bitmap in two critical sections
>> instead of update in the same critical section.
>>
>> Original lock behavior introduced in 7a2fcbf7f857 ("ext4: don't use
>> blocks freed but not yet committed in buddy cache init") to avoid
>> race betwwen ext4_mb_free_blocks and ext4_mb_init_cache:
>> ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
>> ext4_lock_group
>> mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh, ...)
>> mb_free_blocks/ext4_mb_free_metadata
>> ext4_unlock_group
>> ext4_mb_unload_buddy
>>
>> New lock behavior in this patch:
>> ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
>> ext4_lock_group
>> mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh, ...)
>> ext4_unlock_group
>>
>> /* no ext4_mb_init_cache for the same group will be called as
>> ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp will ensure buddy page is update-to-date */
>>
>> ext4_lock_group
>> mb_free_blocks/ext4_mb_free_metadata
>> ext4_unlock_group
>> ext4_mb_unload_buddy
>>
>> As buddy page for group is always update-to-date between
>> ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp and ext4_mb_unload_buddy. Then no
>> ext4_mb_init_cache will be called for the same group concurrentlly when
>> we update bitmap and buddy page betwwen buddy load and unload.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi Kemeng,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply I was trying to understand the codepath
> properly. So I have a question here:
> 
> With the changes you've made in the patch, the flow would look something
> like:
> 
> ext4_mb_clear_bb():
>   ext4_mb_mark_group_bb():
>     ext4_group_lock()
>       - Mark bitmap free
>       - Modify gdp
>     ext4_group_unlock()
>     ext4_handle_dirty_metadata()
> 			- I understand this will add the bitmap and gdp buffers to journal's 
>         dirty metadata list
>   ...
>   ext4_group_lock()
>     ext4_mb_free_metadata()
> 			- Add ext4_free_data entries to sbi->s_freed_data_list. (On commit 
>         ext4_journal_commit_callback() will then free the buddy for these)
>   ext4_group_unlock()
> 
> My question is what happens if journal commits between
> ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() and ext4_mb_free_metadata() call (Possible?). Then we might
> never end up freeing the metadata in the buddy bitmap because the commit callback wont
> be able to find the ext4_free_data entries in sbi->s_freed_data_list.
> 
> Regards,
> ojaswin
> 
Hi Ojaswin, thanks for the reply. To my knowledge, commit should be normally done after handle
is stopped as following:
ext4_journal_start_sb
	start_this_handle
		read_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
		atomic_inc(&transaction->t_updates);
		read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);

ext4_journal_stop
	jbd2_journal_stop
		stop_this_handle
			if (atomic_dec_and_test(&transaction->t_updates))
				wake_up(&journal->j_wait_updates);

jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
	jbd2_journal_wait_updates
		while (1)
			if (!atomic_read(&transaction->t_updates))
				/* break loop */
	...

	if (journal->j_commit_callback)
		journal->j_commit_callback(journal, commit_transaction);

So no commit of transaction should not happen between ext4_handle_dirty_metadata and
ext4_mb_free_metadata.

>> ---
>>  fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 90 ++++++++++++-----------------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> index 46b37f5c9223..e4f1b34448e3 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>> @@ -6135,19 +6135,21 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>  			       ext4_fsblk_t block, unsigned long count,
>>  			       int flags)
>>  {
>> -	struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh = NULL;
>> +	struct ext4_mark_context mc = {
>> +		.handle = handle,
>> +		.sb = inode->i_sb,
>> +		.state = 0,
>> +	};
>>  	struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
>> -	struct ext4_group_desc *gdp;
>>  	struct ext4_group_info *grp;
>>  	unsigned int overflow;
>>  	ext4_grpblk_t bit;
>> -	struct buffer_head *gd_bh;
>>  	ext4_group_t block_group;
>>  	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
>>  	struct ext4_buddy e4b;
>>  	unsigned int count_clusters;
>>  	int err = 0;
>> -	int ret;
>> +	int mark_flags = 0;
>>  
>>  	sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
>>  
>> @@ -6179,18 +6181,6 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>  		/* The range changed so it's no longer validated */
>>  		flags &= ~EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED;
>>  	}
>> -	count_clusters = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, count);
>> -	bitmap_bh = ext4_read_block_bitmap(sb, block_group);
>> -	if (IS_ERR(bitmap_bh)) {
>> -		err = PTR_ERR(bitmap_bh);
>> -		bitmap_bh = NULL;
>> -		goto error_return;
>> -	}
>> -	gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, block_group, &gd_bh);
>> -	if (!gdp) {
>> -		err = -EIO;
>> -		goto error_return;
>> -	}
>>  
>>  	if (!(flags & EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED) &&
>>  	    !ext4_inode_block_valid(inode, block, count)) {
>> @@ -6200,28 +6190,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>  		goto error_return;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	BUFFER_TRACE(bitmap_bh, "getting write access");
>> -	err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, sb, bitmap_bh,
>> -					    EXT4_JTR_NONE);
>> -	if (err)
>> -		goto error_return;
>> -
>> -	/*
>> -	 * We are about to modify some metadata.  Call the journal APIs
>> -	 * to unshare ->b_data if a currently-committing transaction is
>> -	 * using it
>> -	 */
>> -	BUFFER_TRACE(gd_bh, "get_write_access");
>> -	err = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, sb, gd_bh, EXT4_JTR_NONE);
>> -	if (err)
>> -		goto error_return;
>> -#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK
>> -	{
>> -		int i;
>> -		for (i = 0; i < count_clusters; i++)
>> -			BUG_ON(!mb_test_bit(bit + i, bitmap_bh->b_data));
>> -	}
>> -#endif
>> +	count_clusters = EXT4_NUM_B2C(sbi, count);
>>  	trace_ext4_mballoc_free(sb, inode, block_group, bit, count_clusters);
>>  
>>  	/* __GFP_NOFAIL: retry infinitely, ignore TIF_MEMDIE and memcg limit. */
>> @@ -6230,6 +6199,22 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>  	if (err)
>>  		goto error_return;
>>  
>> +#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK
>> +	mark_flags |= EXT4_MB_BITMAP_MARKED_CHECK;
>> +#endif
>> +	err = ext4_mb_mark_group_bb(&mc, block_group, bit, count_clusters,
>> +				    mark_flags);
>> +
>> +
>> +	if (err && mc.changed == 0) {
>> +		ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b);
>> +		goto error_return;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +#ifdef AGGRESSIVE_CHECK
>> +	BUG_ON(mc.changed != count_clusters);
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  	/*
>>  	 * We need to make sure we don't reuse the freed block until after the
>>  	 * transaction is committed. We make an exception if the inode is to be
>> @@ -6252,13 +6237,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>  		new_entry->efd_tid = handle->h_transaction->t_tid;
>>  
>>  		ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group);
>> -		mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, bit, count_clusters);
>>  		ext4_mb_free_metadata(handle, &e4b, new_entry);
>>  	} else {
>> -		/* need to update group_info->bb_free and bitmap
>> -		 * with group lock held. generate_buddy look at
>> -		 * them with group lock_held
>> -		 */
>>  		if (test_opt(sb, DISCARD)) {
>>  			err = ext4_issue_discard(sb, block_group, bit,
>>  						 count_clusters, NULL);
>> @@ -6271,23 +6251,11 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>  			EXT4_MB_GRP_CLEAR_TRIMMED(e4b.bd_info);
>>  
>>  		ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group);
>> -		mb_clear_bits(bitmap_bh->b_data, bit, count_clusters);
>>  		mb_free_blocks(inode, &e4b, bit, count_clusters);
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	ret = ext4_free_group_clusters(sb, gdp) + count_clusters;
>> -	ext4_free_group_clusters_set(sb, gdp, ret);
>> -	ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set(sb, gdp, bitmap_bh);
>> -	ext4_group_desc_csum_set(sb, block_group, gdp);
>>  	ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
>>  
>> -	if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex) {
>> -		ext4_group_t flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, block_group);
>> -		atomic64_add(count_clusters,
>> -			     &sbi_array_rcu_deref(sbi, s_flex_groups,
>> -						  flex_group)->free_clusters);
>> -	}
>> -
>>  	/*
>>  	 * on a bigalloc file system, defer the s_freeclusters_counter
>>  	 * update to the caller (ext4_remove_space and friends) so they
>> @@ -6302,26 +6270,14 @@ static void ext4_mb_clear_bb(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>>  
>>  	ext4_mb_unload_buddy(&e4b);
>>  
>> -	/* We dirtied the bitmap block */
>> -	BUFFER_TRACE(bitmap_bh, "dirtied bitmap block");
>> -	err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bitmap_bh);
>> -
>> -	/* And the group descriptor block */
>> -	BUFFER_TRACE(gd_bh, "dirtied group descriptor block");
>> -	ret = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, gd_bh);
>> -	if (!err)
>> -		err = ret;
>> -
>>  	if (overflow && !err) {
>>  		block += count;
>>  		count = overflow;
>> -		put_bh(bitmap_bh);
>>  		/* The range changed so it's no longer validated */
>>  		flags &= ~EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_VALIDATED;
>>  		goto do_more;
>>  	}
>>  error_return:
>> -	brelse(bitmap_bh);
>>  	ext4_std_error(sb, err);
>>  	return;
>>  }
>> -- 
>> 2.30.0
>>
> 

-- 
Best wishes
Kemeng Shi