Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: SafeSetID: fix UID printed instead of GID

[Paul Moore]

On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 2:50 PM Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn
<aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 8:59 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:44 AM Alexander Mikhalitsyn
> > <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > pr_warn message clearly says that GID should be printed,
> > > but we have UID there. Let's fix that.
> > >
> > > Found accidentaly during the work on isolated user namespaces.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <aleksandr.mikhalitsyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v2: __kuid_val -> __kgid_val
> > > ---
> > >  security/safesetid/lsm.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > I'm assuming you're going to pick this up Micah?
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Dear Paul!
>
> Thanks for your review!
>
> Gentle ping to Micah Morton :-)

Micah?

The right thing would be for Micah to merge this via the SafeSetID
tree, however, considering that it's been over a month with no
response, and this patch looks trivially correct, I can pick this up
via the LSM tree if we don't see anything from Micah this week.

-- 
paul-moore.com