Re: Null pointer dereference during rcutorture test on linux-next from next-20230602
From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Wed Jun 07 2023 - 15:24:18 EST
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 04:48:19PM +0530, Jain, Ayush wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Observed null pointer dereference during rcutorture test on linux-next tree
> from next-20230602.
>
> Commit ID: commit bc708bbd8260ee4eb3428b0109f5f3be661fae46 (HEAD, tag: next-20230602)
>
> Here I am attaching log trace
>
> [12133.344278] rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of test
> [12133.344282] rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode
> [12138.350637] rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: End of episode
> [12143.419412] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
> [12143.427996] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000128
> [12143.435777] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [12143.441517] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [12143.447256] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [12143.450087] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> [12143.454955] CPU: 68 PID: 978653 Comm: rcu_torture_rea Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.4.0-rc5-next-20230606-1686061107994 #1
> [12143.467095] Hardware name: AMD Corporation Speedway/Speedway, BIOS RSW1009C 07/27/2018
> [12143.475934] RIP: 0010:__bitmap_and+0x18/0x70
> [12143.480713] Code: 00 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 41 89 cb 49 89 f9 41 c1 eb 06 74 51 45 89 da 31 c0 45 31 c0 <48> 8b 3c c6 48 23 3c c2 49 89 3c c1 48 83 c0 01 49 09 f8 49 39 c2
> [12143.501675] RSP: 0018:ffffa3a90db70d90 EFLAGS: 00010046
> [12143.507510] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000080
> [12143.515468] RDX: ffff8a1ec17a1d68 RSI: 0000000000000128 RDI: ffff8a1e800429c0
> [12143.523425] RBP: ffff8a1ec17a1980 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8a1e800429c0
> [12143.531385] R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: ffff8a1e800429c0
> [12143.539352] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000032580 R15: 0000000000000000
> [12143.547320] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a2dbf100000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [12143.556354] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [12143.562770] CR2: 0000000000000128 CR3: 0000003089e50000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
> [12143.570729] Call Trace:
> [12143.573463] <IRQ>
> [12143.575714] ? __die+0x24/0x70
> [12143.579130] ? page_fault_oops+0x82/0x150
> [12143.583615] ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x150
> [12143.588001] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
> [12143.592678] ? __bitmap_and+0x18/0x70
> [12143.596768] select_idle_cpu+0x84/0x3d0
> [12143.601059] select_idle_sibling+0x1b7/0x500
> [12143.605831] select_task_rq_fair+0x1b2/0x2e0
> [12143.610603] select_task_rq+0x7a/0xc0
> [12143.614696] try_to_wake_up+0xe8/0x550
> [12143.618885] ? update_process_times+0x83/0x90
> [12143.623747] ? __pfx_hrtimer_wakeup+0x10/0x10
> [12143.628615] hrtimer_wakeup+0x22/0x30
> [12143.632706] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x112/0x2b0
> [12143.637574] hrtimer_interrupt+0x100/0x240
> [12143.642152] __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x63/0x130
> [12143.647796] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x71/0x90
> [12143.653149] </IRQ>
> [12143.655493] <TASK>
> [12143.657834] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
> [12143.663573] RIP: 0010:rcu_torture_read_lock+0x4/0x20 [rcutorture]
> [12143.670389] Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 e9 12 5a f6 d7 66 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa <0f> 1f 44 00 00 e8 b2 12 f6 d7 31 c0 e9 7b 9c a0 d8 66 66 2e 0f 1f
> [12143.691351] RSP: 0018:ffffa3a90e3ebc40 EFLAGS: 00000202
> [12143.697187] RAX: ffffffffc1dff0b0 RBX: 00000000ffffffff RCX: 0000000000000008
> [12143.705155] RDX: 0000000000000060 RSI: 0000000000000060 RDI: ffffa3a90e3ebccc
> [12143.713124] RBP: 0000000000000060 R08: 0000000000000060 R09: 0000000000000000
> [12143.721091] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000060
> [12143.729057] R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffa3a90e3ebe20
> [12143.737027] ? __pfx_rcu_torture_read_lock+0x10/0x10 [rcutorture]
> [12143.743845] rcutorture_one_extend+0xc2/0x3a0 [rcutorture]
> [12143.749980] rcu_torture_one_read+0x192/0x550 [rcutorture]
> [12143.756115] ? update_load_avg+0x7e/0x740
> [12143.760593] ? raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x15/0x30
> [12143.765749] ? newidle_balance+0x26e/0x400
> [12143.770330] ? __pfx_rcu_torture_reader+0x10/0x10 [rcutorture]
> [12143.776854] rcu_torture_reader+0xcd/0x280 [rcutorture]
> [12143.782698] ? __pfx_rcu_torture_timer+0x10/0x10 [rcutorture]
> [12143.789124] kthread+0xe6/0x120
> [12143.792636] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [12143.796823] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
> [12143.800824] </TASK>
>
> Please let me know if any extra information is required.
Could you please let us know which rcutorture scenario this is and/or
what module parameters were supplied to modprobe (depending on how you
initiated the test)? One way to do this is to post the full console
log somewhere, along with the .config.
At first glance, the wakeup path got a NULL cpumask pointer somehow.
Is bisection a possibility? It would be very helpful.
Thanx, Paul