Re: [PATCH v2 -next 2/2] RISC-V/perf: Use standard interface to get INTC domain

From: Atish Patra
Date: Wed Jun 07 2023 - 19:20:05 EST


On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 4:24 AM Sunil V L <sunilvl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Currently the PMU driver is using DT based lookup to
> find the INTC node for sscofpmf extension. This will not work
> for ACPI based systems causing the driver to fail to register
> the PMU overflow interrupt handler.
>
> Hence, change the code to use the standard interface to find
> the INTC node which works irrespective of DT or ACPI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 17 ++---------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index 4f3ac296b3e2..0bc491252a44 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -739,7 +739,6 @@ static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
> {
> int ret;
> struct cpu_hw_events __percpu *hw_events = pmu->hw_events;
> - struct device_node *cpu, *child;
> struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
>
> if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SSCOFPMF)) {
> @@ -756,20 +755,8 @@ static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
> if (!riscv_pmu_use_irq)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> - for_each_of_cpu_node(cpu) {
> - child = of_get_compatible_child(cpu, "riscv,cpu-intc");
> - if (!child) {
> - pr_err("Failed to find INTC node\n");
> - of_node_put(cpu);
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> - domain = irq_find_host(child);
> - of_node_put(child);
> - if (domain) {
> - of_node_put(cpu);
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> + domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(riscv_get_intc_hwnode(),
> + DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);
> if (!domain) {
> pr_err("Failed to find INTC IRQ root domain\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> --
> 2.34.1
>


Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Regards,
Atish