Re: [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: mediatek: mt8188-mt6359: Use bitfield macros for registers

From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Date: Thu Jun 08 2023 - 05:57:39 EST


Il 08/06/23 11:50, Alexandre Mergnat ha scritto:
On 08/06/2023 10:47, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Replace open coded instances of FIELD_GET() with it, move register
definitions at the top of the file and also replace magic numbers
with register definitions.

While at it, also change a regmap_update_bits() call to regmap_write()
because the top 29 bits of AUD_TOP_CFG (31:3) are reserved (unused).

Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-mt6359.c | 32 ++++++++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-mt6359.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-mt6359.c
index 5b2660139421..ac69c23e0da1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-mt6359.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8188/mt8188-mt6359.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
   * Author: Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
   */
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
  #include <linux/input.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
  #include <linux/of_device.h>
@@ -19,6 +20,15 @@
  #include "../common/mtk-afe-platform-driver.h"
  #include "../common/mtk-soundcard-driver.h"
+#define CKSYS_AUD_TOP_CFG    0x032c
+ #define RG_TEST_ON        BIT(0)
+ #define RG_TEST_TYPE        BIT(2)
+#define CKSYS_AUD_TOP_MON    0x0330
+ #define TEST_MISO_COUNT_1    GENMASK(3, 0)
+ #define TEST_MISO_COUNT_2    GENMASK(7, 4)
+ #define TEST_MISO_DONE_1    BIT(28)
+ #define TEST_MISO_DONE_2    BIT(29)
+
  #define NAU8825_HS_PRESENT    BIT(0)
  /*
@@ -251,9 +261,6 @@ static const struct snd_kcontrol_new mt8188_nau8825_controls[] = {
      SOC_DAPM_PIN_SWITCH("Headphone Jack"),
  };
-#define CKSYS_AUD_TOP_CFG 0x032c
-#define CKSYS_AUD_TOP_MON 0x0330
-
  static int mt8188_mt6359_mtkaif_calibration(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
  {
      struct snd_soc_component *cmpnt_afe =
@@ -265,13 +272,13 @@ static int mt8188_mt6359_mtkaif_calibration(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
      struct mtkaif_param *param;
      int chosen_phase_1, chosen_phase_2;
      int prev_cycle_1, prev_cycle_2;
-    int test_done_1, test_done_2;
+    u8 test_done_1, test_done_2;
      int cycle_1, cycle_2;

Shouldn't be unsigned too ?

I'm wondering if it would be better (probably in another patch) to change the data type of the other variables too, to match their use-case. (maybe it's already the case, I'm just wondering)


In theory, yes, cycle_1 and 2 should be unsigned, but the signedness of this
variable is getting used in the calibration logic later, as in the for loop
they are both being reinitialized to -1 ... so I couldn't just switch 'em to
unsigned.

      int mtkaif_chosen_phase[MT8188_MTKAIF_MISO_NUM];
      int mtkaif_phase_cycle[MT8188_MTKAIF_MISO_NUM];
      int mtkaif_calibration_num_phase;
      bool mtkaif_calibration_ok;
-    unsigned int monitor = 0;
+    u32 monitor = 0;
      int counter;
      int phase;
      int i;
@@ -303,8 +310,7 @@ static int mt8188_mt6359_mtkaif_calibration(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
      mt6359_mtkaif_calibration_enable(cmpnt_codec);
      /* set test type to synchronizer pulse */
-    regmap_update_bits(afe_priv->topckgen,
-               CKSYS_AUD_TOP_CFG, 0xffff, 0x4);
+    regmap_write(afe_priv->topckgen, CKSYS_AUD_TOP_CFG, RG_TEST_TYPE);
      mtkaif_calibration_num_phase = 42;    /* mt6359: 0 ~ 42 */
      mtkaif_calibration_ok = true;
@@ -314,7 +320,7 @@ static int mt8188_mt6359_mtkaif_calibration(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
          mt6359_set_mtkaif_calibration_phase(cmpnt_codec,
                              phase, phase, phase);
-        regmap_set_bits(afe_priv->topckgen, CKSYS_AUD_TOP_CFG, 0x1);
+        regmap_set_bits(afe_priv->topckgen, CKSYS_AUD_TOP_CFG, RG_TEST_ON);
          test_done_1 = 0;
          test_done_2 = 0;
@@ -326,14 +332,14 @@ static int mt8188_mt6359_mtkaif_calibration(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
          while (!(test_done_1 & test_done_2)) {
              regmap_read(afe_priv->topckgen,
                      CKSYS_AUD_TOP_MON, &monitor);
-            test_done_1 = (monitor >> 28) & 0x1;
-            test_done_2 = (monitor >> 29) & 0x1;
+            test_done_1 = FIELD_GET(TEST_MISO_DONE_1, monitor);
+            test_done_2 = FIELD_GET(TEST_MISO_DONE_2, monitor);
              if (test_done_1 == 1)
-                cycle_1 = monitor & 0xf;
+                cycle_1 = FIELD_GET(TEST_MISO_COUNT_1, monitor);
              if (test_done_2 == 1)
-                cycle_2 = (monitor >> 4) & 0xf;
+                cycle_2 = FIELD_GET(TEST_MISO_COUNT_2, monitor);
              /* handle if never test done */
              if (++counter > 10000) {
@@ -361,7 +367,7 @@ static int mt8188_mt6359_mtkaif_calibration(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd)
              mtkaif_phase_cycle[MT8188_MTKAIF_MISO_1] = prev_cycle_2;
          }
-        regmap_clear_bits(afe_priv->topckgen, CKSYS_AUD_TOP_CFG, 0x1);
+        regmap_clear_bits(afe_priv->topckgen, CKSYS_AUD_TOP_CFG, RG_TEST_ON);
          if (mtkaif_chosen_phase[MT8188_MTKAIF_MISO_0] >= 0 &&
              mtkaif_chosen_phase[MT8188_MTKAIF_MISO_1] >= 0)

After that:

Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>