Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: socionext: add bindings for the Synquacer platform

[Jassi Brar]

On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 11:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 16/06/2023 18:23, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jun 2023 at 05:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 16/06/2023 05:58, jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Socionext's DeveloperBox is based on the SC2A11B SoC (Synquacer).
> >>> Specify bindings for the platform and boards based on that.
> >>
> >> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "bindings". The
> >> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
> >>
> > I can remove it, but I see many mentions like "Fix bindings for"  "Add
> > binding for" etc in the subject line.
>
> Can we fix them as well?
>
??


> >
> >>
> >> Binding without it's user is usually useless. Where is the user?
> >>
> > It is required for SystemReady-2.0 certification.
>
> For what? If there is no user, it is not required for SR. We don't
> document compatibles for something which does not exist in the projects.
>
The dts/dtsi for synquacer will be added later.
I am sure you are aware that there are countless bindings without
actual use in any dts/dtsi. When exactly did it become mandatory to
have dts/dtsi for the bindings to be merged upstream?

-j