On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 8:35 AM Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
Avoid duplication of functionality by using the generic symbol.
This does have a functional change that intel-pstate will now
match "SOHO server" as well.
And why do you think that it is a good idea to change this behavior?
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 19 ++++---------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 2548ec92faa2..6401338971c7 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -313,18 +313,9 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(intel_pstate_limits_lock);
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-static bool intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server(void)
-{
- if (acpi_gbl_FADT.preferred_profile == PM_ENTERPRISE_SERVER ||
- acpi_gbl_FADT.preferred_profile == PM_PERFORMANCE_SERVER)
- return true;
-
- return false;
-}
-
static bool intel_pstate_get_ppc_enable_status(void)
{
- if (intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server())
+ if (acpi_pm_profile_server())
return true;
return acpi_ppc;
@@ -481,10 +472,6 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
}
-static inline bool intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server(void)
-{
- return false;
-}
#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI */
#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB
@@ -2407,8 +2394,10 @@ static int intel_pstate_init_cpu(unsigned int cpunum)
if (hwp_active) {
intel_pstate_hwp_enable(cpu);
- if (intel_pstate_acpi_pm_profile_server())
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+ if (acpi_pm_profile_server())
hwp_boost = true;
+#endif
}
} else if (hwp_active) {
/*
--
2.34.1