Am Mittwoch, dem 21.06.2023 um 21:31 +0800 schrieb Sui Jingfeng:
On 2023/6/21 18:23, Lucas Stach wrote:I'm not convinced, yet.
This can be shared for drm/etnaviv in the future,While back to the question you ask, I want etnaviv_create_platform_device() to be generic,But it isn't shared,
can be used by multiple place for multiple purpose.
I have successfully copy this to a another drm driver by simply renaming.
The body of the function itself does not need to change.
currently, we just need an opportunity to use this function.
I want to create a dummy platform device,My favorite option would be to just always use the component path even
let this dummy platform be bound to the single PCI GPU master.
etnaviv_create_platform_device("dummy", &dummy_device);
1) To verify the component code path on PCI case.
when the GPU is on a PCI device to keep both paths mostly aligned. One
could easily image both a 3D and a 2D core being made available though
the same PCI device.
2) Possibly for create a device for some other tiny hardware logicDo you have something in mind here? Until now I assumed that only the
come with the platform
GPU core is behind the PCI abstraction. Is there something else sharing
the MMIO space?
Regards,
Lucas
3) Revival component_compare_dev_name() function.
in this compilation unit this function is specific
to the etnaviv driver and I don't see why we shouldn't have etnaviv
specifics in there if it makes the code of this driver easier to
follow.