RE: [RFC PATCH v8 03/10] dpll: core: Add DPLL framework base functions

[Kubalewski, Arkadiusz]

>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2023 7:38 PM
>
>Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 02:18:46PM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>DPLL framework is used to represent and configure DPLL devices
>>in systems. Each device that has DPLL and can configure inputs
>>and outputs can use this framework.
>>
>>Implement core framework functions for further interactions
>>with device drivers implementing dpll subsystem, as well as for
>>interactions of DPLL netlink framework part with the subsystem
>>itself.
>>
>>Co-developed-by: Milena Olech <milena.olech@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Signed-off-by: Milena Olech <milena.olech@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Co-developed-by: Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Signed-off-by: Michal Michalik <michal.michalik@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Co-developed-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@xxxxxxxxx>
>>---
>> drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 953 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h | 104 +++++
>
>Overall, looks very good! I pinpointed couple of nits below, nothing big.
>General question: Why do you put documentation comment to every static
>function? Does not make any sense to me. Even for non-exported functions
>I think it is overkill. Most of them (if not all) give the reader no
>additional information and only make the code a bit harder to read.
>Care to drop them?
>

I forgot to respond here.. I would rather leave it, but if the others think
the same way, we could remove them.

Thank you!
Arkadiusz

[...]