Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

[Jiri Pirko]

Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 05:53:36PM CEST, kuba@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:19:11 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> I don't understand. The discussion in the RFCv8 thread is still going
>> on. The things I mentioned there are ignored. Like for example:
>> 1) mode_set op removal
>> 2) odd ice dpll locking scheme (either fix or describe why it is ok -
>> 				that's the unfinished discussion)
>> 3) header file bits squash I suggested. Vadim wrote that it sounds
>>    reasonable, yet nothing changed
>> 
>> I thought we are past this. Why I have to point the same issues over and
>> over?
>
>FWIW I'm lost in the previous thread, so for me there's value in
>refreshing the series.
>
>But you're right, at the very least there should be a summary of
>outstanding issues / open items / ongoing discussions in the cover
>letter.

Well I would like to conclude discussion in one thread before sending
the next one. What should I do? Should I start the same discussion
pointing out the same issues in this thread again? This can't work.

Even concluded items are ignored, like 3)

IDK, this is very frustrating for me. I have to double check everything
just in case it was not ignored. I don't understand this, there is no
justification.