Re: [PATCH] dma-contiguous: support per-numa CMA for all architectures

[Yajun Deng]

June 24, 2023 8:40 AM, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 May 2023 13:38:21 +0200 Petr Tesařík <petr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 15 May 2023 11:23:27 +0000
>> "Yajun Deng" <yajun.deng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> May 15, 2023 5:49 PM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> This looks fine to me. Can you please work with Barry to make sure
> the slight different place of the initcall doesn't break anything
> for his setup? I doubt it would, but I'd rather have a Tested-by:
> tag.
>> Barry's email is no longer in use. I can't reach him.
>> 
>> Which one? I would hope that his Gmail account is still valid:
>> 
>> Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Maybe his kernel.org address works...
> 
> I have this patch stuck in limbo for 6.4. I guess I'll carry it over
> into the next -rc cycle, see what happens.
> 
> fwiw, it has been in -next for six weeks, no known issues.

Hi, Barry, The slight different place of the initcall, does break anything?