Re: [PATCH] docs: filesystems: idmappings: clarify from where idmappings are taken

[kernel test robot]

Hi Alexander,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on vfs-idmapping/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.4-rc7 next-20230623]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Alexander-Mikhalitsyn/docs-filesystems-idmappings-clarify-from-where-idmappings-are-taken/20230621-180345
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/idmapping.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230621095905.31346-1-aleksandr.mikhalitsyn%40canonical.com
patch subject: [PATCH] docs: filesystems: idmappings: clarify from where idmappings are taken
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230625/202306252253.qxHG1txo-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306252253.qxHG1txo-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst:378: WARNING: Unexpected indentation.

vim +378 Documentation/filesystems/idmappings.rst

   375	
   376	From the implementation point it's worth mentioning how idmappings are represented.
   377	All idmappings are taken from the corresponding user namespace.
 > 378	    - caller's idmapping (usually taken from ``current_user_ns()``)
   379	    - filesystem's idmapping (``sb->s_user_ns``)
   380	    - mount's idmapping (``mnt_idmap(vfsmnt)``)
   381	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki