Re: [PATCH 5/5] scsi: dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Fix warning for sdm845 by adding reg-names

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 26/06/2023 08:38, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> but I guess no resends and it can be superseded.
>>>
>>> Right, the patches got reviews but was never applied... I really need to
>>> find a strategy to keep track of sent patches until they're applied with
>>> my work mailbox, it's not the first time that a patch has gotten
>>> forgotten.
>>
>> There was an error reported on the above series. Why would it be 
>> applied?
> 
> The error report at [0] complains about reg-names but I'm quite sure
> that patch 2/3 resolves this error. Does your bot only apply one patch
> at a time and run the check or apply all of them and then run it? It's
> been a while but I'm fairly sure I ran all of the checks before sending
> since I also documented some other patches in the cover letter there.

You did it in cover letter, not in the patch, so there is no dependency
for bots recorded.

> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/167241769341.1925758.17856681634949446114.robh@xxxxxxxxxx/

Your patch 2/3 could not be applied to any tree. 3/3 applied but without
previous one caused warnings.




Best regards,
Krzysztof