Quoting Jacky Huang (2023-06-22 07:13:43)
From: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@xxxxxxxxxxx>Is there any reason why this changed from numbers to strings? It is
For the declaration of parent clocks, use struct clk_parent_data instead
of a string. Due to the change in the passed arguments, replace the usage
of devm_clk_hw_register_mux() with clk_hw_register_mux_parent_data() for
all cases.
Signed-off-by: Jacky Huang <ychuang3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/clk/nuvoton/clk-ma35d1.c | 306 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 219 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/nuvoton/clk-ma35d1.c b/drivers/clk/nuvoton/clk-ma35d1.c
index 733750dda0f4..f1fe7edd21b5 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/nuvoton/clk-ma35d1.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/nuvoton/clk-ma35d1.c
@@ -63,167 +63,298 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ma35d1_lock);
#define PLL_MODE_SS 2
static const struct clk_parent_data ca35clk_sel_clks[] = {
- { .index = 0 }, /* HXT */
- { .index = 1 }, /* CAPLL */
- { .index = 2 } /* DDRPLL */
+ { .fw_name = "hxt", },
+ { .fw_name = "capll", },
+ { .fw_name = "ddrpll", },
faster to directly index vs. access the clock-names property. The
preference is to use the index field and only use fw_name if we're
migrating legacy clk drivers to use DT based lookups.