Re: [PATCH 03/15] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Require GCC PLL0 DIV clock

[Marijn Suijten]

On 2023-06-27 08:24:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/06/2023 20:53, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > On 2023-06-26 20:51:38, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > <snip>
> >>> Not really, binding also defines the list of clocks - their order and
> >>> specific entries. This changes.
> >>
> >> And so it does in "dt-bindings: clock: qcom,dispcc-sm6125: Remove unused
> >> GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK"?
> > 
> > Never mind: it is the last item so the order of the other items doesn't
> > change.  The total number of items decreases though, which sounds like
> > an ABI-break too?
> 
> How does it break? Old DTS works exactly the same, doesn't it?

So deleting a new item at the end does not matter.  But what if I respin
this patch to add the new clock _at the end_, which will then be at the
same index as the previous GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK?

- Marijn