RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Resctrl - rewrite (WIP)

[Luck, Tony]

>> By itself the core code is useless. Cannot even be built as the
>> controlling Kconfig option "CONFIG_RESCTRL2_FS" must be invoked by
>> a "select" request from architecture specific code that provides
>> the necessary "arch_*()" functions to make everything work.
>
> I would like to try to rebase the RISC-V CBQRI resctrl RFC [1] on top of
> this patch series instead of the mpam snapshot branch [2].

Thanks. That should help shake out any places where I've left in Intel-isms, or
my abstraction is insufficient to handle your architecture.

I've made some significant changes since I posted those patches. I pushed
the latest version to:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux.git    resctrl2_v64

> I had a patch in my RFC that added config option RISCV_ISA_SSQOSID which
> selects ARCH_HAS_CPU_RESCTRL and RESCTRL_FS [3]. It seems I would need
> to change that to select CONFIG_RESCTRL2_FS ?

Yes. Just have your architecture CONFIG option select RESCTRL2_FS

> A patch [4] in that RFC adds the "arch_*()" functions in
> arch/riscv/kernel/qos/qos_resctrl.c

Yes. This is an area that may need some tweaking to get the prototypes
for the arch_*() functions right.

I put all the x86 architecture code under fs/resctrl2/arch/x86/ .... mostly
so I can do quick test builds of both the common code and architecture
code with "make fs/resctrl2/" ... maybe in the end-game they should be
under arch/x86 rather than adding arch specific subdirs under generic
top-level directories (though I see a smattering of "x86" directories in
several places.

-Tony