Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf report: Don't add to histogram when there is no thread found

[Namhyung Kim]

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 3:34 AM James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 27/06/2023 18:19, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:58 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 9:43 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 5:02 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 05:10:58PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> >>>>> thread__find_map() chooses to exit without assigning a thread to the
> >>>>> addr_location in some scenarios, for example when there are samples from
> >>>>> a guest and perf_guest == false. This results in a segfault when adding
> >>>>> to the histogram because it uses unguarded accesses to the thread member
> >>>>> of the addr_location.
> >>>>
> >>>> Looking at the commit 0dd5041c9a0ea ("perf addr_location: Add
> >>>> init/exit/copy functions") that introduced the change, I'm not sure if
> >>>> it's the intend behavior.
> >>>>
> >>>> It might change maps and map, but not thread.  Then I think no reason
> >>>> to not set the al->thread at the beginning.
> >>>>
> >>>> How about this?  Ian?
> >>>> (I guess we can get rid of the duplicate 'al->map = NULL' part)
> >>>
> >>> It seemed strange that we were failing to find a map (the function's
> >>> purpose) but then populating the address_location. The change below
> >>> brings back that somewhat odd behavior. I'm okay with reverting to the
> >>> old behavior, clearly there were users relying on it. We should
> >>> probably also copy maps and not just thread, as that was the previous
> >>> behavior.
> >>
> >> Probably.  But it used to support samples without maps and I think
> >> that's why it ignores the return value of thread__find_map().  So
> >> we can expect al.map is NULL and maybe fine to leave it for now.
> >>
> >> As machine__resolve() returns -1 if it gets no thread, we should set
> >> al.thread when it returns 0.
> >>
> >> Can I get your Acked-by?
> >
> > Yep:
> > Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks good to me too. Should I resend the set with this change instead
> of my one?

No, I can take care of that.  I'll take this as your Acked-by. :)

Thanks,
Namhyung