Re: [PATCH v2 13/15] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Add dispcc node

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 29.06.2023 14:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2023 at 15:14, Marijn Suijten
> <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 2023-06-29 13:56:25, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On 27/06/2023 23:14, Marijn Suijten wrote:
>>>> Enable and configure the dispcc node on SM6125 for consumption by MDSS
>>>> later on.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>>>> index edb03508dba3..a5cc0d43d2d9 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi
>>>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>>>>    * Copyright (c) 2021, Martin Botka <martin.botka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>    */
>>>>
>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm6125.h>
>>>>   #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm6125.h>
>>>>   #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h>
>>>>   #include <dt-bindings/dma/qcom-gpi.h>
>>>> @@ -1203,6 +1204,30 @@ sram@4690000 {
>>>>                     reg = <0x04690000 0x10000>;
>>>>             };
>>>>
>>>> +           dispcc: clock-controller@5f00000 {
>>>> +                   compatible = "qcom,sm6125-dispcc";
>>>> +                   reg = <0x05f00000 0x20000>;
>>>> +                   clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
>>>> +                            <0>,
>>>> +                            <0>,
>>>> +                            <0>,
>>>> +                            <0>,
>>>> +                            <0>,
>>>> +                            <&gcc GCC_DISP_AHB_CLK>,
>>>> +                            <&gcc GCC_DISP_GPLL0_DIV_CLK_SRC>;
>>>> +                   clock-names = "bi_tcxo",
>>>> +                                 "dsi0_phy_pll_out_byteclk",
>>>> +                                 "dsi0_phy_pll_out_dsiclk",
>>>> +                                 "dsi1_phy_pll_out_dsiclk",
>>>> +                                 "dp_phy_pll_link_clk",
>>>> +                                 "dp_phy_pll_vco_div_clk",
>>>> +                                 "cfg_ahb_clk",
>>>> +                                 "gcc_disp_gpll0_div_clk_src";
>>>> +                   power-domains = <&rpmpd SM6125_VDDCX>;
>>>
>>> Would it be logical to specify the required-opps too?
>>
>> Perhaps, but barely any other SoC aside from sm8x50 sets it on dispcc.
>> What should it be, rpmhpd_opp_low_svs?  IIRC we used "svs" for the DSI
>> PHY despite not having a reference value downstream (it sets a range of
>> NOM-TURBO_NO_CPR, and RETENTION when it's off).
> 
> Then for DSI PHY the required-opps should be rpmpd_opp_nom.
Yes

> 
> For the dispcc I think the rpmpd_opp_ret, the lowest possible vote,
> should be enough.
I'm not 100% sure but not specifying an opp and turning on the domain
*******probably******* just sticks with the lowest vote

Konrad
> 
>>
>> - Marijn
>>
>>>
>>>> +                   #clock-cells = <1>;
>>>> +                   #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>>>> +           };
>>>> +
>>>>             apps_smmu: iommu@c600000 {
>>>>                     compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500", "qcom,smmu-500", "arm,mmu-500";
>>>>                     reg = <0x0c600000 0x80000>;
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With best wishes
>>> Dmitry
>>>
> 
> 
>