Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000-idp: Update reserved memory region

From: Komal Bajaj
Date: Wed Jul 05 2023 - 03:07:01 EST




On 7/5/2023 11:19 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 08:40, Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Add missing reserved regions as described in QDU1000 memory map.

Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
index 1d22f87fd238..3f5512ec0a90 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qdu1000-idp.dts
@@ -448,6 +448,32 @@ &qupv3_id_0 {
status = "okay";
};

+&reserved_memory{
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <2>;
+ ranges;
+
+ ecc_meta_data_reserved_mem:ecc_meta_data_reserved_region@e0000000{
no_underscores_in_node_names. Ever.

Also, if you have checked other platforms, you'd have seen that other
platforms use a much more generic node name for 'memory' nodes (which
you should have used too).

These memory nodes are new to QDU platform, so will it be okay if I keep these names without region suffix?

Thanks
Komal


+ no-map;
+ reg = <0x0 0xe0000000 0x0 0x20000000>;
+ };
+
+ harq_buffer_mem:harq_buffer_region@800000000{
+ no-map;
+ reg = <0x8 0x0 0x0 0x80000000>;
+ };
+
+ tenx_sp_buffer_mem:tenx_sp_buffer_region@880000000{
+ no-map;
+ reg = <0x8 0x80000000 0x0 0x50000000>;
+ };
+
+ fapi_buffer_mem:fapi_buffer_region@8d0000000{
+ no-map;
+ reg = <0x8 0xd0000000 0x0 0x20000000>;
+ };
+};
+
&sdhc {
pinctrl-0 = <&sdc_on_state>;
pinctrl-1 = <&sdc_off_state>;
--
2.40.1