Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] cgroup/cpuset: Support remote partitions

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 09:38:12PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> I don't want to add another cpuset.cpus.exclusive.effective control file.
> One possibility is to keep another effective masks in the struct cpuset and
> list both exclusive cpus set by the user and the effective ones side by
> side, like "<cpus> (<effective_cpus>)" if they differ or some other format.
> What do you think?

Hmm... if we go for separate effective mask, I think it'd be better to stay
consistent with cpuset.cpus[.effective]. That's the convention both
cpuset.cpus and cpuset.mems already follow. I'm not sure what we'd gain by
deviating.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun