Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate io queues

[Pingfan Liu]

Hi Ming,

Having no [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: add blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() in inbox.
So I reply here.

At first glance, I think that  the cpu hot plug callback hook should
be the remedy for the newly introduced blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues(),
although it is more complicated.

Consider the scene where nr_cpus=4, which can speed up the dumping
process, the blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() can not utilize the other three
cpus.


Thanks,

Pingfan

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 5:16 PM Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:02:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Take blk-mq's knowledge into account for calculating io queues.
> > >
> > > Fix wrong queue mapping in case of kdump kernel.
> > >
> > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed to kdump command line, see
> > > `Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst`, so num_possible_cpus()
> > > still returns all CPUs.
> >
> > That's simply broken.  Please fix the arch code to make sure
> > it does not return a bogus num_possible_cpus value for these
>
> That is documented in Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
>
> On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed for kdump kernel, and "maxcpu=1"
> simply keep one of CPU cores as online, and others as offline.
>
> So Cc our arch(arm & ppc64) & kdump guys wrt. passing 'maxcpus=1' for
> kdump kernel.
>
> > setups, otherwise you'll have to paper over it in all kind of
> > drivers.
>
> The issue is only triggered for drivers which use managed irq &
> multiple hw queues.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
>