Re: [PATCH v8 2/7] iommu: Move global PASID allocation from SVA to core

[Jacob Pan]

Hi Baolu,

On Sat, 10 Jun 2023 20:13:03 +0800, Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> On 6/3/23 2:22 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > +ioasid_t iommu_alloc_global_pasid_dev(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	ioasid_t max;
> > +
> > +	max = dev->iommu->max_pasids;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * max_pasids is set up by vendor driver based on number of
> > PASID bits
> > +	 * supported but the IDA allocation is inclusive.
> > +	 */
> > +	ret = ida_alloc_range(&iommu_global_pasid_ida,
> > IOMMU_FIRST_GLOBAL_PASID, max - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return IOMMU_PASID_INVALID;
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_alloc_global_pasid_dev);  
> 
> "dev->iommu->max_pasids == 0" indicates no pasid support on the device.
> The code should return IOMMU_PASID_INVALID explicitly. Perhaps we can
> make this function like this:
> 
> ioasid_t iommu_alloc_global_pasid_dev(struct device *dev)
> {
>          int ret;
> 
>          if (!dev->iommu->max_pasids)
>                  return IOMMU_PASID_INVALID;
> 
>          /*
>           * max_pasids is set up by vendor driver based on number of 
> PASID bits
>           * supported but the IDA allocation is inclusive.
>           */
>          ret = ida_alloc_range(&iommu_global_pasid_ida, 
> IOMMU_FIRST_GLOBAL_PASID,
>                                dev->iommu->max_pasids - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> 
>          return ret < 0 ? IOMMU_PASID_INVALID : ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_alloc_global_pasid_dev);
> 
good catch, sorry i missed this. let me send an updated version.

> Other change in this series looks good to me.
> 
> I hope I can queue this series including above change as part of my VT-d
> update for v6.5 to Joerg if no objection.
> 
> Let's try to re-enable this key feature of Intel idxd driver in v6.5.
> 
> Best regards,
> baolu


Thanks,

Jacob