Re: [RESEND] gpio: ws16c48: Fix off-by-one error in WS16C48 resource region extent

[William Breathitt Gray]

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:44:38AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 10:47:18AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 07:41:09AM -0500, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:23:30AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 11:30 PM William Breathitt Gray
> > > > <william.gray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The WinSystems WS16C48 I/O address region spans offsets 0x0 through 0xA,
> > > > > which is a total of 11 bytes. Fix the WS16C48_EXTENT define to the
> > > > > correct value of 11 so that access to necessary device registers is
> > > > > properly requested in the ws16c48_probe() callback by the
> > > > > devm_request_region() function call.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 2c05a0f29f41 ("gpio: ws16c48: Implement and utilize register structures")
> > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Cc: Paul Demetrotion <pdemetrotion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > Why did you need to resend this? Anything changed?
> > > > 
> > > > Bart
> > > 
> > > No changes in code, just added the stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc tag.
> > > 
> > > William Breathitt Gray
> > 
> > Hi Bart,
> > 
> > Would you take this fix through the gpio tree?
> > 
> > William Breathitt Gray
> 
> It looks like this patch was missed. Is there anything further needed or
> can it be queued as it is now?
> 
> William Breathitt Gray

The fix was missed again this past cycle. Are there any particular
issues with merging this patch that I should address? WS16C48 interrupt
handling is still broken so that's the motivation for getting this fix
into the GPIO tree.

William Breathitt Gray

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature