Re: [PATCH] soc: fsl: qe: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy

From: Azeem Shaikh
Date: Tue Jul 11 2023 - 19:55:25 EST

Next message: Jason Gunthorpe: "Re: Memory providers multiplexing (Was: [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] page_pool: remove PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG flag)"
Previous message: Miguel Ojeda: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] rust: workqueue: add bindings for the workqueue"
In reply to: Leo Li: "RE: [PATCH] soc: fsl: qe: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy"
Next in thread: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH] soc: fsl: qe: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Sorry for the late response. But I found some old discussions with the conclusion to be not converting old users. Has this been changed later on?
> https://lwn.net/Articles/659214/
>

@Kees Cook what's your advice here?

Next message: Jason Gunthorpe: "Re: Memory providers multiplexing (Was: [PATCH net-next v4 4/5] page_pool: remove PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG flag)"
Previous message: Miguel Ojeda: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] rust: workqueue: add bindings for the workqueue"
In reply to: Leo Li: "RE: [PATCH] soc: fsl: qe: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy"
Next in thread: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH] soc: fsl: qe: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]