Re: [PATCH v1] riscv: dts: renesas: clean up dtbs_check W=1 warning due to empty phy node

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Sergei.

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 10:43 AM Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/12/23 11:14 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>
> > dtbs_check w/ W=1 complains:
> > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/ethernet@11c20000/ethernet-phy@7: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property
> > Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc/ethernet@11c20000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
> >
> > The ethernet@11c20000 node is guarded by an `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` in
> > rzg2ul-smarc-som.dtsi, where the phy child node is added. In
> > rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi, the ethernet node is marked disabled & the
> > interrupt properties are deleted from the phy child node. As a result,
> > the produced dts looks like:
> >       ethernet@11c20000 {
> >               compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
> >               /* snip */
> >               #address-cells = <0x01>;
> >               #size-cells = <0x00>;
> >               status = "disabled";
> >
> >               ethernet-phy@7 {
> >               };
> >       };
> >
> > Adding a corresponding `#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)` around the node in
> > rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi avoids the complaint, as the empty child node is
> > not added:
> >       ethernet@11c20000 {
> >               compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-gbeth\0renesas,rzg2l-gbeth";
> >               /* snip */
> >               #address-cells = <0x01>;
> >               #size-cells = <0x00>;
> >               status = "disabled";
> >       };
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
> > index d6f18754eb5d..c62debc7ca7e 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/rzfive-smarc-som.dtsi
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ &dmac {
> >       status = "disabled";
> >  };
> >
> > +#if (!SW_ET0_EN_N)
>
>    Are the parens really needed here?

No they aren't. But this follows the existing style of the other users.

>
> >  &eth0 {
> >       status = "disabled";
> >
> [...]

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds