Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] platform/x86/intel/tpmi: Read feature control status
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Wed Jul 12 2023 - 11:07:18 EST
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 03:09:47PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Some of the PM features can be locked or disabled. In that case, write
> interface can be locked.
>
> This status is read via a mailbox. There is one TPMI ID which provides
> base address for interface and data register for mail box operation.
> The mailbox operations is defined in the TPMI specification. Refer to
> https://github.com/intel/tpmi_power_management/ for TPMI specifications.
>
> An API is exposed to feature drivers to read feature control status.
...
> +/*
> + * TPMI PFS and per feature memory size can't exceed 4K.
> + * Also PFS start and feature memory is 4K aligned.
> + */
> +#define TPMI_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE (4 * 1024)
SZ_4K from sizes.h?
...
> +#define TPMI_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MAX_US USEC_PER_SEC
> +#define TPMI_RB_TIMEOUT_MAX_US USEC_PER_SEC
I think it's easier to get in a form (1 * ..._SEC)
...
> +static int tpmi_wait_for_owner(struct intel_tpmi_info *tpmi_info, u8 owner)
> +{
> + u64 control;
> +
> + return read_poll_timeout(readq, control,
> + owner == FIELD_GET(TPMI_CONTROL_STATUS_OWNER, control),
> + TPMI_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_US, TPMI_CONTROL_TIMEOUT_MAX_US, false,
> + tpmi_info->tpmi_control_mem + TPMI_CONTROL_STATUS_OFFSET);
Since you have "false" why not use readq_poll_timeout()?
> +}
...
> + /* Wait for Run Busy clear */
> + ret = read_poll_timeout(readq, control, !(control & TPMI_CONTROL_STATUS_RB),
> + TPMI_RB_TIMEOUT_US, TPMI_RB_TIMEOUT_MAX_US, false,
> + tpmi_info->tpmi_control_mem + TPMI_CONTROL_STATUS_OFFSET);
Ditto.
> + if (ret)
> + goto done_proc;
...
> + size = pfs->pfs_header.num_entries * pfs->pfs_header.entry_size * sizeof(u32);
> + /* This size is coming from trusted hardware, but verify anyway */
I would move this comment before size assignment that we already know that it's
from the trusted hw.
> + if (size > TPMI_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE)
> + return;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko