[RFC PATCH 0/3] memfd: cleanups for vm.memfd_noexec

From: Aleksa Sarai
Date: Thu Jul 13 2023 - 10:34:41 EST


It seems that the most critical issue with vm.memfd_noexec=2 (the fact
that passing MFD_EXEC would bypass it entirely[1]) has been fixed in
Andrew's tree[2], but there are still some outstanding issues that need
to be addressed:

* The dmesg warnings are pr_warn_once, which on most systems means that
they will be used up by systemd or some other boot process and
userspace developers will never see it. The original patch posted to
the ML used pr_warn_ratelimited but the merged patch had it changed
(with a comment about it being "per review"), but given that the
current warnings are useless, pr_warn_ratelimited makes far more
sense.

* vm.memfd_noexec=2 shouldn't reject old-style memfd_create(2) syscalls
because it will make it far to difficult to ever migrate. Instead it
should imply MFD_EXEC.

* The racheting mechanism for vm.memfd_noexec doesn't make sense as a
security mechanism because a CAP_SYS_ADMIN capable user can create
executable binaries in a hidden tmpfs very easily, not to mention the
many other things they can do.

* The memfd selftests would not exit with a non-zero error code when
certain tests that ran in a forked process (specifically the ones
related to MFD_EXEC and MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL) failed.

(This patchset is based on top of Jeff Xu's patches[2] fixing the
MFD_EXEC bug in vm.memfd_noexec=2.)

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZJwcsU0vI-nzgOB_@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230705063315.3680666-1-jeffxu@xxxxxxxxxx/

Aleksa Sarai (3):
memfd: cleanups for vm.memfd_noexec handling
memfd: remove racheting feature from vm.memfd_noexec
selftests: memfd: error out test process when child test fails

include/linux/pid_namespace.h | 16 +++------
kernel/pid_sysctl.h | 7 ----
mm/memfd.c | 32 +++++++----------
tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++----
4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)

--
2.41.0