Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add erratum 3.14 for 88E6390X and 88E6190X

[Andrew Lunn]

> +static int mv88e6390x_serdes_erratum_3_14(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
> +{
> +	int lanes[] = { MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE0, MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE1,
> +		MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE2, MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE3,
> +		MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE0, MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE1,
> +		MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE2, MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE3 };

Please make this const. Otherwise you end up with two copies of it.

> +	int err, i;
> +
> +	/* 88e6390x-88e6190x errata 3.14:
> +	 * After chip reset, SERDES reconfiguration or SERDES core
> +	 * Software Reset, the SERDES lanes may not be properly aligned
> +	 * resulting in CRC errors
> +	 */
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lanes); i++) {
> +		err = mv88e6390_serdes_write(chip, lanes[i],
> +					     MDIO_MMD_PHYXS,
> +					     0xf054, 0x400C);

Does Marvell give this register a name? If so, please add a #define.
Are the bits in the register documented?

> +	if (!err && up) {
> +		if (chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6390X ||
> +		    chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6190X)

6191X? 6193X? 

Please sort these into numerical order.


    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr