Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] perf evlist: Skip dummy event sample_type check for evlist_config
From: Yang Jihong
Date: Tue Jul 18 2023 - 05:31:00 EST
Hello,
On 2023/7/17 22:41, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 15/07/23 06:29, Yang Jihong wrote:
The dummp event does not contain sampls data. Therefore, sample_type does
not need to be checked.
Currently, the sample id format of the actual sampling event may be changed
after the dummy event is added.
Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/util/record.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/record.c b/tools/perf/util/record.c
index 9eb5c6a08999..0240be3b340f 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/record.c
@@ -128,6 +128,13 @@ void evlist__config(struct evlist *evlist, struct record_opts *opts, struct call
evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel) {
if (evsel->core.attr.sample_type == first->core.attr.sample_type)
continue;
+
+ /*
+ * Skip the sample_type check for the dummy event
+ * because it does not have any samples anyway.
+ */
+ if (evsel__is_dummy_event(evsel))
+ continue;
Sideband event records have "ID samples" so the sample type still matters.
Okay, will remove this patch in next version.
Can I ask a little more about this?
Use PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFICATION instead of PERF_SAMPLE_ID because for
samples of type PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE, there may be different record
formats due to different *sample_type* settings, so the fixed SAMPLE_ID
location mode PERF_SAMPLE_NAME is required here.
However, for the sideband event, the samples of the PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE
type is not recorded (only PERF_RECORD_MMAP, PERF_RECORD_COMM, and so
on). Therefore, the "use sample identifier "check can be skipped here.
That's my understanding of PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFICATION . If there is any
error, please help to correct it.
*Sideband event records have "ID samples" so the sample type still matters.*
Does this mean that sideband will also record samples of type
PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE? What exactly is the sampling data?
Thanks,
Yang