[syzbot] [fs?] possible deadlock in inode_add_bytes

From: syzbot
Date: Tue Jul 18 2023 - 05:41:13 EST

Next message: Jonathan Cameron: "Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] iio: adc: meson: tune init sequence"
Previous message: Srinivas Kandagatla: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450-hdk: add other analogue microphones"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 7c2878be5732 Add linux-next specific files for 20230714
git tree: linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14c7fea2a80000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3baff2936ac3cefa
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=440ff8cca06ee7a1d4db
compiler: gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=145a2b64a80000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=117bacb6a80000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/bfdfa043f096/disk-7c2878be.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/cf7a97f69e2a/vmlinux-7c2878be.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8366b63af2c6/bzImage-7c2878be.xz

The issue was bisected to:

commit 1a93dd24f1bee98ca121e68ce5c0de4a60a0a0b6
Author: Carlos Maiolino <cem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Jul 13 13:48:47 2023 +0000

shmem: quota support

bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=15f5143aa80000
final oops: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=17f5143aa80000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13f5143aa80000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+440ff8cca06ee7a1d4db@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 1a93dd24f1be ("shmem: quota support")

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.5.0-rc1-next-20230714-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor340/5089 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888075decae0 (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
ffff888075decae0 (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: inode_add_bytes+0x24/0xf0 fs/stat.c:794

but task is already holding lock:
ffff888075decca0 (&xa->xa_lock#7){..-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline]
ffff888075decca0 (&xa->xa_lock#7){..-.}-{2:2}, at: collapse_file+0x1ccc/0x5530 mm/khugepaged.c:1962

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&xa->xa_lock#7){..-.}-{2:2}:
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x36/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:170
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline]
filemap_remove_folio+0xbf/0x250 mm/filemap.c:259
truncate_inode_folio+0x49/0x70 mm/truncate.c:195
shmem_undo_range+0x363/0x1190 mm/shmem.c:1004
shmem_truncate_range mm/shmem.c:1120 [inline]
shmem_evict_inode+0x334/0xb10 mm/shmem.c:1250
evict+0x2ed/0x6b0 fs/inode.c:665
iput_final fs/inode.c:1791 [inline]
iput.part.0+0x55e/0x7a0 fs/inode.c:1817
iput+0x5c/0x80 fs/inode.c:1807
dentry_unlink_inode+0x292/0x430 fs/dcache.c:401
__dentry_kill+0x3b8/0x640 fs/dcache.c:607
dentry_kill fs/dcache.c:745 [inline]
dput+0x703/0xfd0 fs/dcache.c:913
do_renameat2+0xc4c/0xdc0 fs/namei.c:5011
__do_sys_rename fs/namei.c:5055 [inline]
__se_sys_rename fs/namei.c:5053 [inline]
__x64_sys_rename+0x81/0xa0 fs/namei.c:5053
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key){+.+.}-{2:2}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
inode_add_bytes+0x24/0xf0 fs/stat.c:794
__dquot_alloc_space+0x730/0xb60 fs/quota/dquot.c:1682
dquot_alloc_space_nodirty include/linux/quotaops.h:300 [inline]
dquot_alloc_block_nodirty include/linux/quotaops.h:327 [inline]
shmem_inode_acct_block mm/shmem.c:226 [inline]
shmem_charge+0x152/0x500 mm/shmem.c:429
collapse_file+0x20ad/0x5530 mm/khugepaged.c:1831
hpage_collapse_scan_file+0xc8e/0x1650 mm/khugepaged.c:2285
madvise_collapse+0x52c/0xb50 mm/khugepaged.c:2729
madvise_vma_behavior+0x200/0x1e60 mm/madvise.c:1094
madvise_walk_vmas+0x1cf/0x2c0 mm/madvise.c:1268
do_madvise+0x333/0x660 mm/madvise.c:1448
__do_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1461 [inline]
__se_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1459 [inline]
__x64_sys_madvise+0xaa/0x110 mm/madvise.c:1459
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&xa->xa_lock#7);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_lock_key);
lock(&xa->xa_lock#7);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_lock_key);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor340/5089:
#0: ffff888075decca0 (&xa->xa_lock#7){..-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:376 [inline]
#0: ffff888075decca0 (&xa->xa_lock#7){..-.}-{2:2}, at: collapse_file+0x1ccc/0x5530 mm/khugepaged.c:1962

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 5089 Comm: syz-executor340 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-next-20230714-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/03/2023
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x1b0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
check_noncircular+0x311/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2e3d/0x5de0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ae/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5726
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:133 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:351 [inline]
inode_add_bytes+0x24/0xf0 fs/stat.c:794
__dquot_alloc_space+0x730/0xb60 fs/quota/dquot.c:1682
dquot_alloc_space_nodirty include/linux/quotaops.h:300 [inline]
dquot_alloc_block_nodirty include/linux/quotaops.h:327 [inline]
shmem_inode_acct_block mm/shmem.c:226 [inline]
shmem_charge+0x152/0x500 mm/shmem.c:429
collapse_file+0x20ad/0x5530 mm/khugepaged.c:1831
hpage_collapse_scan_file+0xc8e/0x1650 mm/khugepaged.c:2285
madvise_collapse+0x52c/0xb50 mm/khugepaged.c:2729
madvise_vma_behavior+0x200/0x1e60 mm/madvise.c:1094
madvise_walk_vmas+0x1cf/0x2c0 mm/madvise.c:1268
do_madvise+0x333/0x660 mm/madvise.c:1448
__do_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1461 [inline]
__se_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1459 [inline]
__x64_sys_madvise+0xaa/0x110 mm/madvise.c:1459
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x38/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fa09783a5f9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 b1 1f 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fa0977ad178 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000001c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fa0978c31c8 RCX: 00007fa09783a5f9
RDX: 0000000000000019 RSI: 0000000000400000 RDI: 0000000020000000
RBP: 00007fa0978c31c0 R08: 00007ffc2e84b837 R09: 00007fa0977ad6c0
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fa0978c31cc
R13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007ffc2e84b750 R15: 00007ffc2e84b838
</TASK>

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection

If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

If you want to change bug's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the bug is a duplicate of another bug, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

Next message: Jonathan Cameron: "Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] iio: adc: meson: tune init sequence"
Previous message: Srinivas Kandagatla: "Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450-hdk: add other analogue microphones"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]