On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 07:26:54AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 7/20/23 01:50, Dan Carpenter wrote:
+++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regcache-rbtree.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static int regcache_rbtree_init(struct regmap *map)
int i;
int ret;
- map->cache = kmalloc(sizeof *rbtree_ctx, GFP_KERNEL);
+ map->cache = kmalloc(sizeof *rbtree_ctx, map->alloc_flags);
Yes, that might work as well (and after looking more deeply into the code
I wondered why it wasn't used in the first place).
Based on Mark's feedback I submitted
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230720032848.1306349-1-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
Sorry, I forgot to copy you on that one.
Mark, please let me know what you prefer.
They're both independently fine, but I wouldn't expect anything that's
running in atomic context to be actually using dynamic allocations.