On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 06:08:45PM -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
So the variables can account for resources of huge quantities even on
32-bit machines.
Signed-off-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied to cgroup/for-6.6 with some whitespace adjustments. I think the code
is broken when we cross the signed boundary but that's not a new problem
caused by your patch. I think what we should do is to treat atomic64_t reads
as u64 instead of putting it in s64.