Re: [PATCH v3] perf/core: Bail out early if the request AUX area is out of bound

From: Shuai Xue
Date: Tue Jul 25 2023 - 21:59:33 EST




On 2023/7/25 17:56, James Clark wrote:
>
>
> On 25/07/2023 08:31, Shuai Xue wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2023/7/24 23:21, James Clark wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2023 02:41, Shuai Xue wrote:
>>>> When perf-record with a large AUX area, e.g 4GB, it fails with:
>>>>
>>>> #perf record -C 0 -m ,4G -e arm_spe_0// -- sleep 1
>>>> failed to mmap with 12 (Cannot allocate memory)
>>>>
>>>> and it reveals a WARNING with __alloc_pages():
>>>>
>>>> [ 66.595604] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>> [ 66.600206] WARNING: CPU: 44 PID: 17573 at mm/page_alloc.c:5568 __alloc_pages+0x1ec/0x248
>>>> [ 66.608375] Modules linked in: ip6table_filter(E) ip6_tables(E) iptable_filter(E) ebtable_nat(E) ebtables(E) aes_ce_blk(E) vfat(E) fat(E) aes_ce_cipher(E) crct10dif_ce(E) ghash_ce(E) sm4_ce_cipher(E) sm4(E) sha2_ce(E) sha256_arm64(E) sha1_ce(E) acpi_ipmi(E) sbsa_gwdt(E) sg(E) ipmi_si(E) ipmi_devintf(E) ipmi_msghandler(E) ip_tables(E) sd_mod(E) ast(E) drm_kms_helper(E) syscopyarea(E) sysfillrect(E) nvme(E) sysimgblt(E) i2c_algo_bit(E) nvme_core(E) drm_shmem_helper(E) ahci(E) t10_pi(E) libahci(E) drm(E) crc64_rocksoft(E) i40e(E) crc64(E) libata(E) i2c_core(E)
>>>> [ 66.657719] CPU: 44 PID: 17573 Comm: perf Kdump: loaded Tainted: G E 6.3.0-rc4+ #58
>>>> [ 66.666749] Hardware name: Default Default/Default, BIOS 1.2.M1.AL.P.139.00 03/22/2023
>>>> [ 66.674650] pstate: 23400009 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>>>> [ 66.681597] pc : __alloc_pages+0x1ec/0x248
>>>> [ 66.685680] lr : __kmalloc_large_node+0xc0/0x1f8
>>>> [ 66.690285] sp : ffff800020523980
>>>> [ 66.693585] pmr_save: 000000e0
>>>> [ 66.696624] x29: ffff800020523980 x28: ffff000832975800 x27: 0000000000000000
>>>> [ 66.703746] x26: 0000000000100000 x25: 0000000000100000 x24: ffff8000083615d0
>>>> [ 66.710866] x23: 0000000000040dc0 x22: ffff000823d6d140 x21: 000000000000000b
>>>> [ 66.717987] x20: 000000000000000b x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000030
>>>> [ 66.725108] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffff800008f05be8 x15: ffff000823d6d6d0
>>>> [ 66.732229] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 343373656761705f x12: 726e202c30206574
>>>> [ 66.739350] x11: 00000000ffff7fff x10: 00000000ffff7fff x9 : ffff8000083af570
>>>> [ 66.746471] x8 : 00000000000bffe8 x7 : c0000000ffff7fff x6 : 000000000005fff4
>>>> [ 66.753592] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : ffff000823d6d8d8 x3 : 0000000000000000
>>>> [ 66.760713] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : 0000000000040dc0
>>>> [ 66.767834] Call trace:
>>>> [ 66.770267] __alloc_pages+0x1ec/0x248
>>>> [ 66.774003] __kmalloc_large_node+0xc0/0x1f8
>>>> [ 66.778259] __kmalloc_node+0x134/0x1e8
>>>> [ 66.782081] rb_alloc_aux+0xe0/0x298
>>>> [ 66.785643] perf_mmap+0x440/0x660
>>>> [ 66.789031] mmap_region+0x308/0x8a8
>>>> [ 66.792593] do_mmap+0x3c0/0x528
>>>> [ 66.795807] vm_mmap_pgoff+0xf4/0x1b8
>>>> [ 66.799456] ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x18c/0x218
>>>> [ 66.803365] __arm64_sys_mmap+0x38/0x58
>>>> [ 66.807187] invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128
>>>> [ 66.810922] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x58/0x188
>>>> [ 66.815698] do_el0_svc+0x34/0x50
>>>> [ 66.818999] el0_svc+0x34/0x108
>>>> [ 66.822127] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0
>>>> [ 66.826296] el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8
>>>> [ 66.829946] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>>>>
>>>> 'rb->aux_pages' allocated by kcalloc() is a pointer array which is used to
>>>> maintain AUX trace pages. The allocated page for this array is physically
>>>> contiguous (and virtually contiguous) with an order of 0..MAX_ORDER. If the
>>>> size of pointer array crosses the limitation set by MAX_ORDER, it reveals a
>>>> WARNING.
>>>>
>>>> So bail out early with -EINVAL if the request AUX area is out of bound,
>>>> e.g.:
>>>>
>>>> #perf record -C 0 -m ,4G -e arm_spe_0// -- sleep 1
>>>> failed to mmap with 22 (Invalid argument)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Shuai,
>>
>> Hi, James,
>>
>>>
>>> Now that I think about this, isn't the previous error "failed to mmap
>>> with 12 (Cannot allocate memory)" better than "failed to mmap with 22
>>> (Invalid argument)"?
>>
>> If I see a "invalid argument", I am expected to check my perf command
>> first. But for "Cannot allocate memory", I will doubt that the system
>> have problem but I dont have any idea about.
>>
>> IMO, I prefer "invalid argument". But I can change back to previous error
>> message if you insist.
>>
>>
>
> Maybe, but if a tool is currently doing something like an increasing
> loop to check for the max possible aux buffer size and checking for "12
> (Cannot allocate memory)" then you could consider this change a
> userspace breaking one.
>
> The script would probably just be checking for any error, but you never
> know.
>
> I agree the error codes are quite non specific and don't really help
> with showing the cause of the problem. But I can't see how the memory
> one isn't more specific to the aux buffer size in this case.
>
> I searched for other errors returned after checking get_order() and I
> found both -EINVAL and -ENOMEM, so if there is no consensus maybe it's
> best to stick to the existing return value.

Ok, I will change back to previous -ENOMEM :)

Thank you.

Best Regards,
Shuai


>
> James
>
>>> And you might want to split the doc change out if they are going to be
>>> merged through separate trees.
>>
>> Will do that.
>>
>>>
>>> And one comment below:
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> changes since v2:
>>>> - remove unnecessary overflow check (per Peter)
>>>>
>>>> changes since v1:
>>>> - drop out patch2 because it has been fixed on upstream (Thanks James for reminding)
>>>> - move sanity check into rb_alloc_aux (per Leo)
>>>> - add overflow check (per James)
>>>> ---
>>>> kernel/events/ring_buffer.c | 3 +++
>>>> tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt | 3 ++-
>>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
>>>> index a0433f37b024..5933ce45c68a 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/events/ring_buffer.c
>>>> @@ -699,6 +699,9 @@ int rb_alloc_aux(struct perf_buffer *rb, struct perf_event *event,
>>>> watermark = 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + /* Can't allocate more than MAX_ORDER */
>>>> + if (get_order((unsigned long)nr_pages * sizeof(void *)) > MAX_ORDER)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> rb->aux_pages = kcalloc_node(nr_pages, sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL,
>>>> node);
>>>> if (!rb->aux_pages)
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
>>>> index 680396c56bd1..5d8d3ad084ed 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-record.txt
>>>> @@ -290,7 +290,8 @@ OPTIONS
>>>> specification with appended unit character - B/K/M/G. The
>>>> size is rounded up to have nearest pages power of two value.
>>>> Also, by adding a comma, the number of mmap pages for AUX
>>>> - area tracing can be specified.
>>>> + area tracing can be specified. With MAX_ORDER set as 10 on
>>>> + arm64 platform , the maximum AUX area is limited to 2GiB.
>>>
>>> Minor nit: I wouldn't expect a Perf tool user to know what "MAX_ORDER"
>>> is, and I don't think the limitation is Arm specific? Maybe something in
>>> more relevant terms is more useful:
>>>
>>> The maximum AUX area is limited by the page size of the system. For
>>> example with 4K pages configured, the maximum is 2GiB.
>>
>> Agreed. Will change it.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> James
>>
>> Thank you for valuable comments.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Shuai
>>>
>>>>
>>>> -g::
>>>> Enables call-graph (stack chain/backtrace) recording for both