Re: [RESEND PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcase for xdp attaching failure tracepoint
From: Leon Hwang
Date: Wed Jul 26 2023 - 21:57:37 EST
On 27/7/23 05:52, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 7/20/23 8:52 AM, Leon Hwang wrote:
>> Add a test case for the tracepoint of xdp attaching failure by bpf
>> tracepoint when attach XDP to a device with invalid flags option.
>>
>> The bpf tracepoint retrieves error message from the tracepoint, and
>> then put the error message to a perf buffer. The testing code receives
>> error message from perf buffer, and then ASSERT "Invalid XDP flags for
>> BPF link attachment".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_attach.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
>> .../bpf/progs/test_xdp_attach_fail.c | 52 +++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 117 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_attach_fail.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_attach.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_attach.c
>> index fa3cac5488f5d..99f8d03f3c8bd 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_attach.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_attach.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> #include <test_progs.h>
>> +#include "test_xdp_attach_fail.skel.h"
>> #define IFINDEX_LO 1
>> #define XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE (1U << 4)
>> @@ -85,10 +86,74 @@ static void test_xdp_attach(const char *file)
>> bpf_object__close(obj1);
>> }
>> +struct xdp_errmsg {
>> + char msg[64];
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void on_xdp_errmsg(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 size)
>> +{
>> + struct xdp_errmsg *ctx_errmg = ctx, *tp_errmsg = data;
>> +
>> + memcpy(&ctx_errmg->msg, &tp_errmsg->msg, size);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const char tgt_errmsg[] = "Invalid XDP flags for BPF link attachment";
>> +
>> +static void test_xdp_attach_fail(const char *file)
>
> The test crashed: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/5672753995/job/15373384795#step:6:8037
>
> Please monitor the CI test result in the future.
>
Get it. I'll fix it as soon as possible. And make sure all the CI tests are passed.
>> +{
>> + __u32 duration = 0;
>> + int err, fd_xdp, fd_link_xdp;
>> + struct bpf_object *obj = NULL;
>> + struct test_xdp_attach_fail *skel = NULL;
>> + struct bpf_link *link = NULL;
>> + struct perf_buffer *pb = NULL;
>> + struct xdp_errmsg errmsg = {};
>> +
>> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, opts);
>> +
>> + skel = test_xdp_attach_fail__open_and_load();
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_xdp_attach_fail_skel"))
>> + goto out_close;
>> +
>> + link = bpf_program__attach_tracepoint(skel->progs.tp__xdp__bpf_xdp_link_attach_failed,
>> + "xdp", "bpf_xdp_link_attach_failed");
>> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_tp"))
>> + goto out_close;
>> +
>> + /* set up perf buffer */
>> + pb = perf_buffer__new(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.xdp_errmsg_pb), 1,
>> + on_xdp_errmsg, NULL, &errmsg, NULL);
>> +
>> + err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &fd_xdp);
>> + if (CHECK_FAIL(err))
>> + goto out_close;
>> +
>> + opts.flags = 0xFF; // invalid flags to fail to attach XDP prog
>> + fd_link_xdp = bpf_link_create(fd_xdp, IFINDEX_LO, BPF_XDP, &opts);
>> + if (CHECK(fd_link_xdp != -22, "bpf_link_create_failed",
>
> Please stay with the ASSERT_* macro.
>
Get it.
Thanks,
Leon