Re: [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: crypto: Add binding for TI MCRC64 driver

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 30/07/2023 20:55, Kamlesh Gurudasani wrote:
> Add binding for Texas Instruments MCRC64 driver

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.

Here and subject: drop driver. Bindings are for hardware.

Neither commit nor bindings in description: field explain what is this
hardware.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kamlesh Gurudasani <kamlesh@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/ti,mcrc64.yaml | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  MAINTAINERS                                             |  5 +++++
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/ti,mcrc64.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/ti,mcrc64.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1d1e3f87638c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/ti,mcrc64.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/crypto/ti,mcrc64.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Texas Instruments MCRC64 bindings

Drop bindings. If you tested your code, you would see a warning, so:

It does not look like you tested the bindings, at least after quick
look. Please run `make dt_binding_check` (see
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions).
Maybe you need to update your dtschema and yamllint.

> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Kamlesh Gurudasani <kamlesh@xxxxxx>
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: ti,mcrc64

What's this? Part of SoC? Then the compatible is not correct.

> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  power-domains:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - clocks
> +  - power-domains
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    mcrc64: mcrc64@30300000 {

Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation


> +      compatible = "ti,mcrc64";
> +      reg = <0x00 0x30300000 0x00 0x1000>;
> +      clocks = <&k3_clks 116 0>;
> +      power-domains = <&k3_pds 116 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> +      };

Indentation is messed up.
> 

Best regards,
Krzysztof