Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] selftests/nolibc: avoid sign-compare warnings

[Thomas Weißschuh]

Hi Zhangjin!

On 2023-08-01 13:48:19+0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > These warnings will be enabled later so avoid triggering them.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > index cb17cccd0bc7..82714051c72f 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c
> > @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ static int test_mmap_munmap(void)
> >  	};
> >  
> >  	page_size = getpagesize();
> > -	if (page_size < 0)
> > +	if (page_size == 0)
> >  		return -1;
> >
> 
> It was my mistake before, but do we need to align with the one used in
> test_getpagesize():
> 
>     static int test_getpagesize(void)
>     {
>             long x = getpagesize();
>             int c;
>     
>             if (x < 0)
>                     return x;
> 
> Use 'long' instead of 'size_t' to declare page_size?

Good point.

Given that getpagesize() is documented as returning "int" I guess we
should actually change the implementation in nolibc.

> Thanks,
> Zhangjin
> 
> >  	/* find a right file to mmap, existed and accessible */
> > @@ -998,7 +998,7 @@ static int run_stdlib(int min, int max)
> >  #define EXPECT_VFPRINTF(c, expected, fmt, ...)				\
> >  	ret += expect_vfprintf(llen, c, expected, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> >  
> > -static int expect_vfprintf(int llen, size_t c, const char *expected, const char *fmt, ...)
> > +static int expect_vfprintf(int llen, int c, const char *expected, const char *fmt, ...)
> >  {
> >  	int ret, fd, w, r;
> >  	char buf[100];
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.41.0