Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] net: phy: at803x: fix the wol setting functions

[Paolo Abeni]

On Mon, 2023-07-31 at 14:58 +0000, Leo Li wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 3:14 AM
> > To: Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>; Russell King
> > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; David S . Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jakub
> > Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; David Bauer <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Viorel Suman
> > <viorel.suman@xxxxxxx>; Wei Fang <wei.fang@xxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] net: phy: at803x: fix the wol setting functions
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:53:19PM -0500, Li Yang wrote:
> > > In commit 7beecaf7d507 ("net: phy: at803x: improve the WOL feature"),
> > > it seems not correct to use a wol_en bit in a 1588 Control Register
> > > which is only available on AR8031/AR8033(share the same phy_id) to
> > > determine if WoL is enabled.  Change it back to use
> > > AT803X_INTR_ENABLE_WOL for determining the WoL status which is
> > > applicable on all chips supporting wol. Also update the
> > > at803x_set_wol() function to only update the 1588 register on chips having
> > it.
> > 
> > Do chips which do not have the 1588 register not have WoL? Or WoL
> > hardware is always enabled, but you still need to enable the interrupt.
> 
> Some of them do and some don't, which is removed in the other patch
> from the series.  Since I don't find the register to enable it, I
> guess it always enabled.
> 
> > 
> > Have you tested on a range of PHY? It might be better to split this patch up a
> > bit. If it causes regressions, having smaller patches can make it easier to find
> > which change broken it.
> 
> No, I only have AR8035 to test with.  Changes for other chips are
> according to the datasheet.  It would be good if others having the
> hardware can test it too.

Adding Luo Jie for awareness.

@Luo Jie: do you have access to other chips handled by this driver
other then AR8035? could you please test this series:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=770734

?

Thanks!

Paolo