RE: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: add Intel Agilex5 clock manager

[Rabara, Niravkumar L]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 August, 2023 3:02 PM
> To: Rabara, Niravkumar L <niravkumar.l.rabara@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ng, Adrian Ho Yin <adrian.ho.yin.ng@xxxxxxxxx>; andrew@xxxxxxx;
> conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Turquette, Mike <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx;
> wen.ping.teh@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: add Intel Agilex5 clock
> manager
> 
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 10:58:42AM +0800, niravkumar.l.rabara@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> > From: Niravkumar L Rabara <niravkumar.l.rabara@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add clock ID definitions for Intel Agilex5 SoCFPGA.
> > The registers in Agilex5 handling the clock is named as clock manager.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Teh Wen Ping <wen.ping.teh@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Niravkumar L Rabara <niravkumar.l.rabara@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Damn, I was too late - you already sent a v3 :/
> 
> However, there only seems to be a v3 of this one patch and it was sent in
> reply to the v2 series? The normal thing to do is resend the entire series, not
> just one patch, as a new thread. Not using a new thread may make it harder
> to apply & will also bury the email in people's mailboxes that use things like
> mutt. A single patch as a reply is also confusing, as the rest of the v3 looks like
> it is missing!
> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.

Sorry I made a mistake. 
Should I send out entire series with PATCH v3 subject? Or should I wait for review comment on remaining patches and then send entire series with rework and  subject prefix PATCH v3? 

Thanks,
Nirav