[RFC][PATCH v2 0/5] cpuidle,teo: Improve TEO vs NOHZ

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Aug 02 2023 - 09:31:43 EST

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH v2 1/5] tick/nohz: Introduce tick_get_sleep_length()"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH v2 4/5] cpuidle/teo: Avoid tick_nohz_next_event()"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH v2 2/5] cpuidle: Inject tick boundary state"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Patches attempting to solve the TEO tick/nohz vs timer-pull issue.

Very lightly tested..

Since last time:

- 'split' tick_nohz_get_sleep_length()
- replaced the tick heuristic

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH v2 1/5] tick/nohz: Introduce tick_get_sleep_length()"
Previous message: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH v2 4/5] cpuidle/teo: Avoid tick_nohz_next_event()"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "[RFC][PATCH v2 2/5] cpuidle: Inject tick boundary state"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]