Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: Enable audio on AM62A

[Devarsh Thakkar]

Hi Jai, Nishant,

On 02/08/23 19:05, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 17:10-20230802, Jai Luthra wrote:
>> Hi Devarsh,
>>
>> On Aug 02, 2023 at 16:15:12 +0530, Devarsh Thakkar wrote:
>>> Hi Jai,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch.
>>>
>>> On 31/07/23 18:14, Jai Luthra wrote:
>>>> Add nodes for audio codec and sound card, enable the audio serializer
>>>> (McASP1) under use and update pinmux.
>>>>
>>>> Link: https://www.ti.com/lit/zip/sprr459
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jai Luthra <j-luthra@xxxxxx>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@xxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>>>> index 752c2f640f63..5f68d2eefe0f 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62a7-sk.dts
>>>> @@ -125,6 +125,41 @@ led-0 {
>>>>  			default-state = "off";
>>>>  		};
>>>>  	};
>>>> +
>>>> +	tlv320_mclk: clk-0 {
>>>> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
>>>> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
>>>> +		clock-frequency = <12288000>;
>>>> +	};
>>>> +
>>>> +	codec_audio: sound {
>>>> +		compatible = "simple-audio-card";
>>>> +		simple-audio-card,name = "AM62Ax-SKEVM";
>>>
>>> In my opinion better to give the codec name instead of board name here.
>>
>> I agree, maybe calling it "sk-am62a-tlv320aic3106" would be the most 
>> clear option.
>>
>> Running a quick ripgrep on next tree:
>>
>> $ rg "simple-audio-card,name" arch/*/boot/dts/
>>
>> I see a healthy mix of using both board and/or codec name here - with TI 
>> almost always using the board name. Maybe we can change the convention, 
>> but it would be a good idea to at least update SK-AM62 as well to use 
>> the new convention.
>>
>> Is it okay with you if it is handled as a separate series?
> 

Yes agreed, the naming can be taken care of as separate series as it also
applies to other TI board (AM62x), we can brainstorm on the naming separately
and not block this patch.

Reviewed-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@xxxxxx>

Regards
Devarsh

> Will this cleanup of existing board break any userspace? If so, NO and
> follow existing "board" convention - I'd like to maintain consistency,
> even if that is not exactly clean! If not, cleanup in a later series
> is fine, but please make sure to follow through this week - with this
> patch following the convention of choice.
>