Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs()

[Sean Christopherson]

On Wed, Aug 02, 2023, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Aug 2023 01:42:54 +0100,
> Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestions; I can go with a common declaration. Along
> > with that, do we want to keep defining
> > __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS in the arch code that supports it or
> > convert it into a CONFIG_?
> 
> This isn't something that a user can select, more something that is an
> architectural decision. Maybe in a later patch if there is a consensus
> around that, but probably not as part of this series.

+1.  I agree it's annoying that KVM uses a mix of Kconfigs and manual #defines
for the various "KVM_HAVE" knobs, but we have so many of both that one-off
conversions without a real need don't make much sense.