Re: [PATCH V5,net-next] net: mana: Add page pool for RX buffers

[Jesse Brandeburg]

On 8/2/2023 11:07 AM, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> Add page pool for RX buffers for faster buffer cycle and reduce CPU
> usage.
> 
> The standard page pool API is used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V5:
> In err path, set page_pool_put_full_page(..., false) as suggested by
> Jakub Kicinski
> V4:
> Add nid setting, remove page_pool_nid_changed(), as suggested by
> Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> V3:
> Update xdp mem model, pool param, alloc as suggested by Jakub Kicinski
> V2:
> Use the standard page pool API as suggested by Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> ---

> diff --git a/include/net/mana/mana.h b/include/net/mana/mana.h
> index 024ad8ddb27e..b12859511839 100644
> --- a/include/net/mana/mana.h
> +++ b/include/net/mana/mana.h
> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ struct mana_recv_buf_oob {
>  	struct gdma_wqe_request wqe_req;
>  
>  	void *buf_va;
> +	bool from_pool; /* allocated from a page pool */

suggest you use flags and not bools, as bools waste 7 bits each, plus
your packing of this struct will be full of holes, made worse by this
patch. (see pahole tool)


>  
>  	/* SGL of the buffer going to be sent has part of the work request. */
>  	u32 num_sge;
> @@ -330,6 +331,8 @@ struct mana_rxq {
>  	bool xdp_flush;
>  	int xdp_rc; /* XDP redirect return code */
>  
> +	struct page_pool *page_pool;
> +
>  	/* MUST BE THE LAST MEMBER:
>  	 * Each receive buffer has an associated mana_recv_buf_oob.
>  	 */


The rest of the patch looks ok and is remarkably compact for a
conversion to page pool. I'd prefer someone with more page pool exposure
review this for correctness, but FWIW

Reviewed-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>